This book isn’t even out yet. We have a few excerpts coming from the French version and some claiming access to the galleys of the Ignatius Press translation. We have no sense of context. Secular media and Catholic media hostile to the Pope are portraying it as a rift. Other Catholics, supportive of the Pope, are portraying it as a betrayal. But right now, any speculation is exactly that. Speculation.
Remember the fuss over the 2011 interview when people thought the excerpt of “a male prostitute with AIDS” using a condom meant a change in Church teaching? As it turned out, he was describing a person moving slowly turning towards thinking about consequences of actions. I suspect in this book, we’ll find out that the conflict was not a conflict at all.
Another thing to remember is that there is no counter-magisterium here. If I’m wrong and it turns out that what the Pope ultimately decides—and remember, he is opposed to ending celibacy—is different from the views presented in this book, what the Pope decides will be binding.
But now is not the time to look for heroes and villains, nor battle to the death for the teachings we think must or must not be. It’s certainly not time to bewail disasters to the Church. We don’t know the context of the presented snippets, and once we do know, we know who has the authority to shepherd the Church.
...what the Pope decides will be binding.
ReplyDeleteA very Vatican I notion. The idea that the pope is everyone's boss, that he can tell bishops what they must do, is unhistorical and unCatholic.
There will never be true unity among Christians until we Catholics repudiate not only the errors of Vatican II but those of Vatican I as well.
The “errors of Vatican I” eh? Well, you’ve demonstrated that you’ll reject anything that goes against your views. Since Vatican I is doctrine, you demonstrate an obstinate denial of truth defined by the Church as well as refuse submission of intellect and will to the Pope. Those are the definitions of heresy and schism.
ReplyDelete